
Odd cycles and low oddness







This conecture is false.
Case 2: If all of the edges of the form are contained in the same cycle in a 2-factor of
, then replacing the edges
with the edges
converts this 2-factor of
into a 2-factor of
disjoint copies of the Petersen graph. Hence, when restricted to each
, the 2-factor of
consists of a cycle with 5 vertices and a
-path containing a total of 5 vertices. These paths must be joined together through the edges of the form
creating a cycle of length 5n. Hence, in this case the 2-factor of
contains
cycles of length 5 and one cycle of length 5n (which is odd).
Now, is a bridgeless cubic graph whose 2-factors contain only odd cycles, but no 2-factor of
contains fewer than
cycles.
what is oddness
The notion of oddness of a graph requires explanation.
Let be a bridgeless cubic
Let be a bridgeless cubic graph. The oddness of a 2-factor
is the number of odd circuits of
. The oddness of
is the smallest oddness over all 2-factors. For example, a 3-edge-colorable cubic graph has oddness zero and the Petersen graph has oddness two.
This conjecture is false.
For odd
and
, let
be the graph obtained by deleting an edge, say
, from the Petersen graph. Define
to be the graph obtained by joining vertex
and vertex
with an edge (with subscripts reduced modulo
). For each
, the set
is an edge cut. Hence, in any 2-factor of
, either none of the edges of the form
are contained in a cycle, or all of them are contained in the same cycle.
Case 1: If none of the edges described above are contained in a cycle of a 2-factor of
, then this 2-factor contains a 2-factor of
for each
. These 2-factors are also 2-factors of the graphs
, that is, each is a 2-factor of the Petersen graph. Each 2-factor of the Petersen graph consists of two cycles of 5 vertices, hence, any such 2-factor of
contains
cycles of odd length.
Case 2: See the comment below.