data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eec51/eec511631463682e1bf4fd904f2a1f535faa1cfa" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5dacb/5dacb91225eef7928cec695ce38125405ae99310" alt="$ k $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/484ed/484ed7890db47b12ba0fc6a2da66319eeb8fd2d9" alt="$ d $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44a0f/44a0f3c670b1b1ad9bd6537432c5bd3f5613bd36" alt="$ \ge d $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5dacb/5dacb91225eef7928cec695ce38125405ae99310" alt="$ k $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5dacb/5dacb91225eef7928cec695ce38125405ae99310" alt="$ k $"
It is an easy consequence of Euler's formula that every 3-polytope has a face which is either a triangle, a quadrilateral, or a pentagon. The 120-cell is a 4-polytope in which every 2-face is a pentagon (in fact every 3-face is a regular dodecahedron). Perles and Shephard asked whether there exist higher dimensional polytopes in which all 2-faces have at least 5 vertices. This question was answered in the negative by Kalai [K] who showed that every 5-polytope has a 2-face with at most 4 vertices. So, if we define to be the smallest integer
satisfying the above conjecture for
, or
if none exists, then
.
This conjecture is still open for simple polytopes. However, it is known that for every positive integer , there exists an integer
so that every simple polytope of dimension
either has a 2-dimensional face which is a triangle, or a
-dimensional face which is combinatorially isomorphic to a cube. This was proved by Kalai [K] using some earlier results of Nikulin and of Blind and Blind. Actually, something much stronger holds here: simple polytopes of sufficiently high dimension without 2-faces which are triangles must have most
-dimensional faces combinatorially isomorphic to the
-cube.
The following is an interesting weakening of the above conjecture.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5dacb/5dacb91225eef7928cec695ce38125405ae99310" alt="$ k $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/484ed/484ed7890db47b12ba0fc6a2da66319eeb8fd2d9" alt="$ d $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d77f3/d77f3bb215ea5a4fa0ae2dd1608a7b7728ccfbdc" alt="$ L $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5dacb/5dacb91225eef7928cec695ce38125405ae99310" alt="$ k $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44a0f/44a0f3c670b1b1ad9bd6537432c5bd3f5613bd36" alt="$ \ge d $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5dacb/5dacb91225eef7928cec695ce38125405ae99310" alt="$ k $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d77f3/d77f3bb215ea5a4fa0ae2dd1608a7b7728ccfbdc" alt="$ L $"
Defining to be the smallest integer
satisfying this conjecture for
, or
if none exists, we find that
(by the consequence of Euler's formula in the first paragraph). Meisinger, Kleinschmidt, and Kalai [MKK] proved that
with the help of FLAGTOOL, a computer program which can compute linear relations for
-vectors. This weaker conjecture is known to be true for simple polytopes.
Bibliography
[MKK] G. Meisinger, P. Kleinschmidt, and G. Kalai, Three theorems, with computer-aided proofs, on three-dimensional faces and quotients of polytopes. The Branko Grünbaum birthday issue. Discrete Comput. Geom. 24 (2000), no. 2-3, 413--420. MathSciNet
*[K] G. Kalai, On low-dimensional faces that high-dimensional polytopes must have. Combinatorica 10 (1990), no. 3, 271--280. MathSciNet
* indicates original appearance(s) of problem.