data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eec51/eec511631463682e1bf4fd904f2a1f535faa1cfa" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c055/7c05567e70bc8cd9abf31e8fbac4899063ba7dcb" alt="$ AG(3,2) $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6aaff/6aaff1caac626ec15f2df26ac266aca4deada9b2" alt="$$E(M) \leq c(M) c(M^*) / 2$$"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e432/0e4328784c9f744405bf728e8d2b4230cf1c60ff" alt="$ c(M) $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3aac8/3aac8d2ce8894cbee2469f471ce6f36d2ac8a0a4" alt="$ M $"
If is a 2-connected matroid with at least two elements then it was proved in [LO] that
where
is the size of the largest circuit in
.
Equality can hold in this bound -- in particular the binary affine cube is an 8-element self-dual matroid with circumference 4. There are various graphic matroids for which equality holds, and these have been classified in [W] where it is shown that they are all series-parallel networks and hence not 3-connected.
This question is therefore asking whether is the sole
-connected example where equality holds; this is known to be true for all matroids on up to 9 elements.
(A variant of this question would be to ask if is the only non-graphic example other than trivial modifications like replacing every element with an equally sized parallel class.)
Bibliography
[LO] Lemos, Manoel; Oxley, James A sharp bound on the size of a connected matroid. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 353 (2001), no. 10, 4039--4056 MathSciNet
[W] Wu, Pou-Lin Extremal graphs with prescribed circumference and cocircumference. Discrete Math. 223 (2000), no. 1-3, 299--308 MathSciNet
* indicates original appearance(s) of problem.