data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eec51/eec511631463682e1bf4fd904f2a1f535faa1cfa" alt=""
We let denote the crossing number of a graph
.
Conjecture Every graph
with
satisfies
.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63029/63029ed2de9c2397279e2387d1f7889152351813" alt="$ G $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a338/9a3385fd24f44283780862fd8387af80d3ed9de7" alt="$ \chi(G) \ge t $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b243c/b243ce009f07316e71ba3f99ee2caa61c1ebf874" alt="$ cr(G) \ge cr(K_t) $"
This conjecture is an interesting weakening of the disproved Hajos Conjecture which asserted that implies that
contains a subdivision of
.
A minimal counterexample to Albertson's conjecture is critical, with minimum degree . Using this and the crossing lemma, Albertson, Cranston and Fox showed that a minimum counterexample has at most
vertices. They then analyzed small cases to show that the conjecture holds for
. More recently, Barat and Toth [BT] sharpened these arguments to show that the conjecture holds for
.
Bibliography
[BT] J. Barat and G. Toth, Towards the Albertson Conjecture
* indicates original appearance(s) of problem.