<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://openproblemgarden.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Open Problem Garden - Seymour&amp;#039;s Second Neighbourhood Conjecture - Comments</title>
 <link>http://openproblemgarden.org/op/seymours_second_neighbourhood_conjecture</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Seymour&#039;s Second Neighbourhood Conjecture&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Counterexample for the proof  (re: Seymour&#039;s Second Neighbourhood Conjecture)</title>
 <link>http://openproblemgarden.org/op/seymours_second_neighbourhood_conjecture#comment-6923</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As was indicated, Lemma 2 is false. &lt;a href=&quot;http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/2324/cexampl.png&quot;&gt;Here is a counterexample to lemma 2&lt;/a&gt;. Note that it is not a counterexample to the conjecture, since it has two sinks.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:34:26 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sjcjoosten</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6923 at http://openproblemgarden.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: So is this proof valid or  (re: Seymour&#039;s Second Neighbourhood Conjecture)</title>
 <link>http://openproblemgarden.org/op/seymours_second_neighbourhood_conjecture#comment-6775</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I believe the mentioned  prof is not valid.  Is your proof working?   And sorry for the late reply, our system falsely recognized your comment as a spam.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 00:21:02 +0200</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>rs</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6775 at http://openproblemgarden.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>So is this proof valid or  (re: Seymour&#039;s Second Neighbourhood Conjecture)</title>
 <link>http://openproblemgarden.org/op/seymours_second_neighbourhood_conjecture#comment-6714</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So is this proof valid or not? I am currently working on a proof and am wondering whether or not I should be bothering&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:02:52 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6714 at http://openproblemgarden.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: It is proved  (re: Seymour&#039;s Second Neighbourhood Conjecture)</title>
 <link>http://openproblemgarden.org/op/seymours_second_neighbourhood_conjecture#comment-6697</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the reference. The proof, however, seems flawed. The basic outline of the proof (if I understood it correctly)  is as follows: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol class=&quot;enumerate&quot;&gt; \item If &lt;img class=&quot;teximage&quot; src=&quot;/files/tex/b8e7ad0330f925492bf468b5c379baec88cf1b3d.png&quot; alt=&quot;$ G $&quot; /&gt; has a sink, then this sink satisfies the conditions. \item An oriented graph without directed cycles has a sink. \item Then one proves directly that a graph containing a directed cycle has    a vertex (even on that cycle) that satisfies the conditions.  &lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The last part (Lemma 2 of the manuscript), is not true -- take a directed cycle &lt;img class=&quot;teximage&quot; src=&quot;/files/tex/05d3558ef52267cc1af40e658352d98883668ee3.png&quot; alt=&quot;$ C $&quot; /&gt;, add many independent points &lt;img class=&quot;teximage&quot; src=&quot;/files/tex/302cdeba125e821f3406302c9789229d48f42ea7.png&quot; alt=&quot;$ X $&quot; /&gt;, and add all the arcs from &lt;img class=&quot;teximage&quot; src=&quot;/files/tex/05d3558ef52267cc1af40e658352d98883668ee3.png&quot; alt=&quot;$ C $&quot; /&gt; to &lt;img class=&quot;teximage&quot; src=&quot;/files/tex/302cdeba125e821f3406302c9789229d48f42ea7.png&quot; alt=&quot;$ X $&quot; /&gt;. Now the conjecture is true for this graph (one can take any of the sinks -- vertices in &lt;img class=&quot;teximage&quot; src=&quot;/files/tex/302cdeba125e821f3406302c9789229d48f42ea7.png&quot; alt=&quot;$ X $&quot; /&gt;), but it is not true that one can choose a vertex of &lt;img class=&quot;teximage&quot; src=&quot;/files/tex/05d3558ef52267cc1af40e658352d98883668ee3.png&quot; alt=&quot;$ C $&quot; /&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The omission in the proof of Lemma 2 is that it&#039;s tacitly assumed, that adjacent vertices of the cycle have no common out-neighbours.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:37:34 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Robert Samal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6697 at http://openproblemgarden.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It is proved  (re: Seymour&#039;s Second Neighbourhood Conjecture)</title>
 <link>http://openproblemgarden.org/op/seymours_second_neighbourhood_conjecture#comment-6696</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This conjecture has been proved. You can find the proof &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cst.cmich.edu/users/smith1kw/REU2002/SeymoursNbhdConj.pdf&quot;&gt; here &lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:39:09 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6696 at http://openproblemgarden.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Seymour&#039;s Second Neighbourhood Conjecture</title>
 <link>http://openproblemgarden.org/op/seymours_second_neighbourhood_conjecture</link>
 <description>&lt;table cellspacing=&quot;10&quot;&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
  &lt;td&gt;
    Author(s):
        &lt;a href=&quot;/category/seymour&quot;&gt;Seymour&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
  &lt;/td&gt;
  &lt;td align=right&gt;
    Subject:
        &lt;a href=&quot;/category/graph_theory&quot;&gt;Graph Theory&lt;/a&gt; » &lt;a href=&quot;/category/directed_graphs&quot;&gt;Directed Graphs&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
  &lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;

&lt;tr&gt;
  &lt;td colspan=2&gt;
    &lt;table border=1 cellspacing=&quot;5&quot;&gt;
      &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;
        &lt;div class=&quot;envtheorem&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Conjecture&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Any oriented graph has a vertex whose outdegree is at most its second outdegree. &lt;/div&gt;

      &lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
    &lt;/table&gt;
  &lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://openproblemgarden.org/category/seymour">Seymour, Paul D.</category>
 <category domain="http://openproblemgarden.org/category/caccetta_haggkvist">Caccetta-Häggkvist</category>
 <category domain="http://openproblemgarden.org/category/neighbourhood">neighbourhood</category>
 <category domain="http://openproblemgarden.org/category/second">second</category>
 <category domain="http://openproblemgarden.org/category/seymour_0">Seymour</category>
 <category domain="http://openproblemgarden.org/category/graph_theory">Graph Theory</category>
 <category domain="http://openproblemgarden.org/category/directed_graphs">Directed Graphs</category>
 <comments>http://openproblemgarden.org/op/seymours_second_neighbourhood_conjecture#comment</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:43:47 +0200</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>nkorppi</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">646 at http://openproblemgarden.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
